LINK            LINK

 

This essay was originally published in the Chattahoochie Review, and was picked as a Notable Essay of 2000 by Best 
American Essays of 2001. 

THE SURGEON'S LITTLE HELPERS
by Susan O'Neill

	Military hospitals in Viet Nam performed all kinds of surgeries. We had, 
after all, surgeons from just about every specialty that existed--orthopedic 
surgeons, general surgeons, ear-nose-and-throat surgeons, eye surgeons; I 
even recall one excellent plastic surgeon, whose insistence upon elegant, 
exact, teeny-tiny stitches drove his less precise fellow "cutters" up the 
wall.

	I saw, in my year in-country, many heroic, sophisticated and complex 
procedures. I saw surgery performed on beating hearts; I saw complicated 
abdominal resections; I saw exacting work on the nerves and tendons of 
injured hands; and I saw many, many expertly-performed amputations. These 
procedures were done under less than ideal conditions. It was always, for 
instance, warmer than it should have been in the operating rooms, even 
though they were usually air-conditioned. Air filtration was pretty much an 
impossible dream. There were, inevitably, flies.

	And, of course, most of the wounds were horribly dirty to begin with.

	Dramatic miracle surgeries aside, probably the most common operation we 
performed was a very unsophisticated, very basic procedure called 
"debridement." It was what you did when your patient had been wounded by, 
say,  a fragmentation grenade or a land mine, something that destroyed a lot 
of tissue in an area outside the sealed, sterile body cavities. Something 
that packed the wounded limb or buttocks with dirt, bits of metal and shards 
from bones that lay near the injured flesh.

	During our basic medical training at Fort Sam Houston, Texas, we had been 
told that this sort of wound was the object  of modern weaponry. If you kill 
a man, they told us, you eliminate one soldier. If you wound a man gravely 
but not fatally, you eliminate more; other potential fighters are 
sidetracked because they feel obliged to stop long enough to move their 
injured buddy from the field. Such compassion was a strategic disadvantage.

	The guns we used, M16s--and those that THEY used, AK 47s--were also 
designed to complicate an injury. At Fort Sam, the munitions experts took us 
out to the firing range, where they shot an M16 round into a target that was 
essentially a bone encapsulated in a thigh-sized mold of firm gelatin. They 
then showed us the entry wound--a round, neat, bullet-sized hole in the 
front of the mold--and the exit wound, which was a fist-sized deficit in the 
rear. After the round entered, they explained, it expanded, shattering the 
bone. The bone then became its own internal fragmentation grenade, exploding 
small, sharp pieces through the softer tissue behind it.

	I assume the VC and the NVA had their own equivalent of Fort Sam Houston, 
because they, too, managed to get the desired effect from their weapons. Our 
hospitals received many, many young soldiers, both US and Vietnamese, who 
had massive tissue damage. We also received many, many Vietnamese 
civilians--young and old, of both sexes--who suffered the same types of 
injuries because they had stepped on land mines, or because they had 
accidentally wandered between a weapon of one sort or another and its 
target. Or, perhaps, because they had been  the target. We seldom knew the 
why of these patients; we just worked on them. Day and night; night and day.

	This is what we did when we met one of those perfect war wounds, a gaping 
hole packed with clotted blood and gritty red clay, the flesh hanging in 
shreds:  First, we flooded the hole with saline, washed it with surgical 
soap, flooded it with more saline, painted it with betadine solution, and 
draped it in sterile covers--covers that were far cleaner than the wound 
itself. Then, depending on the severity of total body damage or the number 
of patients in the OR at the time, all of us who were not needed to hand 
instruments or hold retractors--doctors, nurses and techs--took up the heavy 
sterile scissors called "Mayos" and began to cut away the dead tissue.

	This was "debridement."

	We snipped away bits of muscle until we reached tissue that twitched when 
we cut, which meant it was alive. We trimmed dead bits of small blood 
vessels away until we reached those that bled--they were alive. These, the 
surgeon--or, if he was impossibly busy and the vessel a minor one, the 
nurse--would tie off.

	We would also pull out bits of metal or stone or dislodged bone or dirt as 
we went, while the patient slept peacefully under the anesthesia mask. Since 
the wounds were filthy, antibiotics were a must; they were given in high 
doses with the patient's IV fluids.

	Also, because the wounds were filthy, we very seldom closed them during the 
first operation.

	Instead, once we cleared out the dead tissue, we packed the open wounds 
with gauze. We would begin by laying a sterile gauze sponge, soaked with 
sterile saline, on the newly-debrided area, right on the open flesh. Then, 
we would pack more gauze, crumpled up in fluffy fistfuls, on top of that, 
filling in the hole. Finally, we'd wrap the whole thing in rolls and rolls 
of spongy gauze Kerlix bandages. We might wrap a sterile ace bandage over 
the whole thing to hold everything secure. And we'd tape it all together.

	Then we'd send the patient wherever he was supposed to be sent. Sometimes, 
if his other injuries warranted it--head or spinal wounds or other traumas 
that we were not equipped to treat safely--we'd evacuate him out, usually to 
Japan. If there was no rush to send him out, we'd send him in, to one of our 
own surgical wards.

	After a day or two or more had passed, we'd bring him back in for further 
wound debridement. We'd put him to sleep, and cut off all that bulky 
bandaging we'd put on him the last time.

	That was when, in many cases, we found the maggots.

	The thought is repulsive. The first time I saw maggots in a wound, white 
and plump and squirming under the stained gauze, I nearly vomited. The 
doctor who was operating merely said, "Ah--the Surgeon's Little Helpers."

	This was his explanation:

	Maggots are the larvae of flies. However, unlike the flies that spawned 
them--who've been in some truly disgusting places--maggots are not really a 
source of filth in themselves. In fact, they're clean, newly-hatched and 
quite virginal--but in order to live, they must eat what we consider filth. 
In this case, it was dead tissue.

	By debriding, we were also removing dead tissue. So the maggots and the 
surgical team were
allies, working toward the same goal.

	Maggots, being maggots, get no real respect; we summarily washed them out 
of the wound and disposed of them with the old bandages. Then we went about 
our business, re-trimming the dead flesh. Depending upon the relative 
cleanliness of what came out of our mutual efforts, we then re-packed the 
wound, or we sewed it up.

	Some of these wounds could not be sewn up because they would have to be 
covered with skin grafts--which were usually done elsewhere. Sometimes, they 
could be--in the case of an amputated limb, for example, once the wound was 
clean, then the surgeon might sew the flap of live flesh over the end of the 
bone.

	The wonder was that so many men with so much wrong with them managed to 
live. It helped that they were young; it helped that they were usually in 
excellent condition, well-fed and well-exercised. It helped that med-evac 
teams--the pilots and staff who manned the huey helicopters painted with red 
crosses that airlifted the injured from the battlefield--were daring and 
quick. It helped that the doctors were efficient and competent, and that the 
nurses and techs were well-trained--and that we all worked so well together 
to save these men.

	Of course, after all that work on the part of so many people, once he had 
been hospitalized, debrided, sewn up and released, the patient was often 
sent back into battle. Which made many of us wonder what the point of this 
whole thing might be.

	Consider. To do this rather barbaric procedure of debridement required 
hours of expensive hospital time. It required thousands of dollars in 
medical supplies--linens, anesthesia gases and chemicals, disposable gloves, 
blades and sutures, gauze, IV gear and bottles of solutions, blood, 
antibiotics, saline, soaps, betadine, unguents, and so forth. It required 
the ministrations of at least one surgeon--whose time was like gold back in 
the States--and an absolute minimum of two support staff members, one of 
which was a nurse. And an anesthetist. And it required all this two, three, 
maybe four times over.

	That was just for the hospitalization. This man was also evacuated from the 
battle field by helicopter--which involved a precision piece of aviation 
equipment, lots of fuel, a trained pilot and crew, and emergency medical 
equipment and supplies.

	So all this time, money and care--all these resources and personnel--are 
spent making this soldier well once again. And he is sent back into battle. 
Where, in some cases, he is re-injured--which starts the cycle over again.

	Or killed.

	In either case, no one seems to have profited. The surgeon added nothing to 
his store of knowledge--all he did was cut and tie and bandage and sew, 
things he could've done as an intern. Nor did the anesthetist, nor the 
surgical staff. There was no monetary return for spent supplies, no bonus 
for the spent time. The patient lost valuable flesh, perhaps his valuable 
life.

	Even the Surgeon's Little Helpers were dead.

	Seems to me we would've been well ahead of the game to have avoided sending 
the soldier out to get injured in the first place. Unless all we were doing 
was testing our weaponry.

	And hell, you can do that with a bone in a jello mold.


BIO:
I'm the author of Don't Mean Nothing: Short Stories of Viet Nam, a fiction 
collection drawn loosely from my experience as an Army nurse during the Viet 
Nam war. It was published in hard cover by Ballantine, and is currently out 
in paperback through UMass Press. I've published fiction and non-fiction in 
all kinds of media, including Chattahoochie Review, where this piece was 
originally published and Amazon Shorts (short stories sold independently on 
Amazon.com for 49 cents each--a kind of reader's iPod concept). I live in 
Eastern MA with my husband, co-edit an ezine for flash fiction called Vestal 
Review, am about to become a grandmother for the second time, and spend much 
of my time trying to market a long, intricate novel called American Family. 
My website is: http://susanoneill.us

Susan O'Neill

 

LINK            LINK

 

Google

I'm a member of the PayPal Developer Network

This website copyright © 2001-2002. All rights reserved.
 

NOTICE/DISCLAIMER: Links on the following pages are provided for your convenience, they don't constitute an endorsement of the linked pages, or any commercial or private issues or products therein. We make no warrantee or representation concerning the content of those sites or secondary sites to which they are linked.

PRIVACY STATEMENT: E-mail links are provided as a means to contact us for additional information or to make comments. The sender's return e-mail address will be used to respond to comments and questions and may be made available to others for the same purpose. This web site contains links to other external web sites. If you decide to utilize any of the external links, you will be directed to a site, which is not covered by our privacy policy. We recommend that you to read the privacy statements of these sites since their policies may differ from ours.


Site design by: velvetillusion

RETURN TO TOP

BACK TO HOMEPAGE

Hit Counter